10 Benefits of Carrots: The Crunchy Powerfood

1. Improved Vision Western culture’s understanding of carrots being “good for the eyes” is one of the few we got right. Carrots are rich in beta-carotene, which is converted into vitamin A in the liver. Vitamin A is transformed in the retina, to rhodopsin, a purple pigment necessary for night vision.

Healthy Skin Diet: Why Juicing Is the Key to Young, Vibrant Skin

Admit it; as we age, we all take a look in the mirror one morning and think to ourselves, gosh, I wish I would have taken better care of myself. The wrinkles start setting in, the spots and blemishes become more pronounced, the skin dulls, and we look older!.

Making Home Life Easier for Allergy Sufferers

t is not uncommon for people to be born with an allergy of some sort these days. Although different in severity, allergies inevitably affect the sufferer's life by influencing what they can and can't eat or what areas and times of year they need to look out for.

ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers

There are systems in your body that work together to keep your blood pressure at a level high enough to get enough oxygen and nutrients around your body. ACE inhibitors and ARBs lower your blood pressure by acting on one of these systems; the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system..

Which Exercises Are Best For Building Muscle?

Today we will teach you exactly that and show you how to set up your workout plan for best results. If you pull out your current training plan in front of you right now

Showing posts with label latest health research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label latest health research. Show all posts

12/27/12

Shaping healthcare-seeking processes during fatal illness in resource-poor settings. A study in Lao PDR

Background

There are profound social meanings attached to bearing children that affect the experience of losing a child, which is akin to the loss of a mother in the household. The objective of this study is to comprehend the broader processes that shape household healthcare-seeking during fatal illness episodes or reproductive health emergencies in resource-poor communities.

Methods

The study was conducted in six purposively selected poor, rural communities in Lao PDR, located in two districts that represent communities with different access to health facilities and contain diverse ethnic groups. Households having experienced fatal cases were first identified in focus group discussions with community members, which lead to the identification of 26 deaths in eleven households through caregiver and spouse interviews. The interviews used an open-ended anthropological approach and followed a three-delay framework. Interpretive description was used in the data analysis.

Results

The healthcare-seeking behavior reported by caregivers revealed a broad range of providers, reflecting the mix of public, private, informal and traditional health services in Lao PDR. Most caregivers had experienced multiple constraints in healthcare-seeking prior to death. Decisions regarding care-seeking were characterized as social rather than individual actions. They were constrained by medical costs, low expectations of recovery and worries about normative expectations from healthcare workers on how patients and caregivers should behave at health facilities to qualify for treatment. Caregivers raised the difficulties in determining the severity of the state of the child/mother. Delays in reaching care related to lack of physical access and to risks associated with taking a sick family member out of the local community. Delays in receiving care were affected by the perceived low quality of care provided at the health facilities.

Conclusions

Care-seeking is influenced by family- and community-based relations, which are integrated parts of people's everyday life. The medical and normative responses from health providers affect the behavior of care-seekers. An anthropological approach to capture the experience of caregivers in relation to deciding, seeking and reaching care reveals the complexity and socio-cultural context surrounding maternal and child mortality and has implications for how future mortality data should be developed and interpreted.

Assessing research impact in academic clinical medicine: a study using Research Excellence Framework pilot impact indicators

Background

Funders of medical research the world over are increasingly seeking, in research assessment, to complement traditional output measures of scientific publications with more outcome-based indicators of societal and economic impact. In the United Kingdom, the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) developed proposals for the Research Excellence Framework (REF) to allocate public research funding to higher education institutions, inter alia, on the basis of the social and economic impact of their research. In 2010, it conducted a pilot exercise to test these proposals and refine impact indicators and criteria.

Methods

The impact indicators proposed in the 2010 REF impact pilot exercise are critically reviewed and appraised using insights from the relevant literature and empirical data collected for the University of Oxford's REF pilot submission in clinical medicine. The empirical data were gathered from existing administrative sources and an online administrative survey carried out by the university's Medical Sciences Division among 289 clinical medicine faculty members (48.1% response rate).

Results

The feasibility and scope of measuring research impact in clinical medicine in a given university are assessed. Twenty impact indicators from seven categories proposed by HEFCE are presented; their strengths and limitations are discussed using insights from the relevant biomedical and research policy literature.

Conclusions

While the 2010 pilot exercise has confirmed that the majority of the proposed indicators have some validity, there are significant challenges in operationalising and measuring these indicators reliably, as well as in comparing evidence of research impact across different cases in a standardised manner. It is suggested that the public funding agencies, medical research charities, universities, and the wider medical research community work together to develop more robust methodologies for capturing and describing impact, including more valid and reliable impact indicators.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More